Today we’re posting here and on the Britannica Blog a somewhat detailed overview of the new site that we will launch shortly. Instead of repeating those details here, I would like to take this opportunity to share with you how we see the future development of this site and how it fits into the current Internet publishing environment.
Much has been said lately about the collaborative nature of creating, documenting, and sharing knowledge. What is surprising about this discussion is that for some people this process seems possible only now because of the interactivity of the Internet. Others, including us at Britannica, take a different perspective, one that has historical roots. For us, the creation and documentation of knowledge has always been best achieved, and sometimes only achieved, through an intensely collaborative process.
At Britannica, for example, we’ve been working for 240 years at creating, documenting and sharing knowledge through a process in which thousands of expert contributors and dozens if not hundreds of editors work daily to produce factually correct, objective, well written, and up-to-date encyclopedia entries. Our readers have also played an important part in this process. For many years we have received and answered letters in which they have shared their points of view with us or suggested specific improvements. Recently, the volume of comments we get from readers has intensified through the direct feedback system on our site and by regular email.
So for us collaboration is not something new; it is not something we consider daring or experimental. It is something we’ve always done in creating Encyclopaedia Britannica. Obviously, we share with many the view that the Internet brings significant opportunities to make this collaborative process more inclusive, and that by doing so we will not only improve the quality of our content but also increase its reach and relevance. It should not be a surprise then that among the main objectives of our new site are to make it very easy for our contributors, other scholars, and regular readers to engage with our content by suggesting improvements to our editors; and to provide the editing tools they need to create and share their own content at the site.
The Consequences of Listening to Experts
But there are significant differences between our approach and what is popularly termed “Web 2.0.” First, and most important, we believe that the creation and documentation of knowledge is a collaborative process but not a democratic one, and this has at least three consequences.
The first one is ownership. Here I am not referring to copyright ownership but to owning the responsibility that comes with having created or documented a set of ideas or a body of knowledge. That someone is, or should be, responsible for what he or she writes and shares with others is not a new idea. It has long been part of who and what we are as humans. At the new Britannica site, we will welcome and facilitate the increased participation of our contributors, scholars, and regular users, but we will continue to accept all responsibility of what we write under our name. We are not abdicating our responsibility as publishers or burying it under the now-fashionable “wisdom of the crowds.”
The second consequence of our collaborative-but-not-democratic approach is that we recognize the voices and powers of experts. The plan for the new site goes to great lengths to increase the relationships we have with thousands of our current contributors as well as with new experts recommended or identified by the user community. We are calling this larger group our new “community of scholars.” To this special group we will provide a set of editing tools, promotional and community features, and incentive plans for them to engage with Britannica content as well as a place at the site for them to publish directly and under their own names for other Britannica users. This content created by the community of scholars will be controlled by each individual creator, and they will be responsible for deciding what feedback they accept or reject from those reading their work.
Finally, the third consequence of this approach is objectivity, and it requires experts. Certainly, objectivity is difficult to attain, but we’re committed to it. We believe that to provide lively and intelligent coverage of complex subjects requires experts and knowledgeable editors who can make astute judgments that cut through the cacophony of competing and often confusing viewpoints on a topic. In contrast to our approach, democratic systems settle for something bland and less informative, what is sometimes termed a “neutral point of view.”
Desire to Share and Participate is Strong
We also know that there are many Britannica users who, although they may not be experts in a given field, are interested in spreading knowledge and information and sharing their contributions to that effort with others. The new site will make it easy for our users to do so by making the Britannica content available for them to quote, modify, save under their name, and share it with others at the site. So regular users not only will be able to submit their suggestions to the editors of Britannica, but also create their own content or modify Britannica’s coverage under their own names and share the results with others in a special section of the site. We believe that by allowing our users the flexibility of using existing Britannica content, properly quoting or modifying it, and by doing so under their names, we will not only facilitate their ability to learn more about that topic, but also inspire in them the responsibility that comes with having created a new treatment under their name.
As we launch this important new project at Britannica, we realize that not everything will run smoothly. This new approach in publishing and engaging communities has required us to rethink almost all of our internal procedures and to invest significantly in editorial and technology resources. We apologize beforehand for any temporary malfunction that our users may experience as the new features and tools are launched in the coming weeks and months. But most important, I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to participate, to help us with your ideas about how to fulfill our mission to improve the understanding of ourselves and the universe in which we live.
Please look at the new site now in beta testing, read about the plans we have for the weeks and months ahead, and let us know what you think. And stay with us and join us as we gradually introduce the new features.